Title: Precast Bridge Deck Design Systems
Date: March-April, 1986
Volume: 31
Issue: 2
Page number: 40-94
Author(s): Mrinmay Biswas
https://doi.org/10.15554/pcij.03011986.40.94

Click here to access the full journal article

Abstract

This report describes applications of full depth, precast concrete panels for the rehabilitation of deteriorated bridge decks and the construction of new bridges. Emphasis is placed on systems of construction  and the economy derived in using precast concrete for bridge construction. The report presents design systems, details of joints and joint material used for a number of highway and railway bridges. The  advantages and a few of the difficulties involved in this construction method are discussed including some pertinent research work.

References

1. Anderson, A. R., "Systems Concepts for Precast and Prestressed Concrete Bridge Construction," Special Report 132, Systems  Building for Bridges, Highway Research Board, Washington, D.C.,  1972, pp. 9-21.

2. Tang, M. C., "System Construction of Medium-Span Bridges in Prestressed Concrete," Transportation Research Record B71, Segmental and Systems Bridge Construction; Concrete Box Girder and Steel Design, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 1982, pp. 12-17.

3. Hill, J. J., and Shirole, A. M., "Current Practices in Systems Construction of Concrete Bridge Structures," Transportation Research Record 87I, Segmental and Systems Bridge Construction; Concrete Box Girder and Steel Design,  Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 1982, pp. 9-12.

4. Muller J., "Ten Years of Experience in Precast Segmental Construction," PCI JOURNAL, V. 20, No. 1, January- February 1975, pp. 28-61.

5. Bender, B., and Libby, J. R., Discussions of "Ten Years of Experience in Precast Segmental Construction" by J. Muller; and closure, PCI JOURNAL, V. 20, No. 5, September-October 1975, pp.  1-85.

6. Bender, B. F., "Provisions for Possible Reconstruction of Decks on Segmental Box Girder Bridges," PCI JOURNAL, V. 22, No. 4, July-August 1977, pp. 80-84.

7. NCHRP Synthesis of Highway  Practice 53, Precast Concrete Elements for Transportation Facilities, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 1978, 48 p.

8. Podolny, W., Jr., "An Overview of Precast Prestressed Segmental Bridges,"  PCI JOURNAL, V. 24, No. 1, January- February 1979, pp. 56-87.

9. Podolny, W., Jr., (Compiler), Prestressed Concrete Segmental Bridges, U.S. DOT, FHWA, Structural Engineering Series  No. 6, Washington, D.C., August 1979,212 p.

10. Podolny, W., Jr., and Muller, J. M., Construction and Design of Prestressed Concrete Segmental Bridges, John Wiley & Sons, N.Y., 1982, 561 p.

11. Ward, D. J., "An Overview of Prestressed Segmental Concrete Bridges," PCI JOURNAL, V. 28, No. 2, March-April 1983, pp. 120-131.

12. Matt, P., "Status of Segmental Bridge Construction in Europe," PCI JOURNAL, V. 28, No. 3, May-June 1983, pp.  104-125.

13. McClure, R. M., West, H. H., and Hoffman, P. C., "Observations From  Tests on a Segmental Bridge," Transportation Research Record 950, V. 2,Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C.,  1984, pp. 60-67.

14. Wium, D. J, W., and Buyukorturk, 0., "Problems in Designing Prestressed  Segmental Concrete Bridges," Transportation Research Record 950, V. 2,Transportation Research Board,  Washington, D.C., 1984, pp. 68-75.

15. Rabbat, B. G., and Russel, H. G., "Proposed Replacement of AASHTO Girders With New Optimized Sections," Transportation Research Record 950, V. 2,  Transportation Research Board,Washington, D.C., 1984, pp. 85-92.

16. Hurlbut, R., "146-Ft Long Precast Prestressed Bridge Girders in Washington State," PCI JOURNAL, V. 24, No. 1, January-February 1979, pp. 88-92.

17. Standard Specifications for Highway B  ridges, 13th Edition, American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, D.C., 1983, pp. 91, 99, 264 and 265.

18, Buth, E., Furr, H. L., Jones, H. L., Butler, H. D., and Toprac, A. A., "Use of Prestressed, Precast Concrete Panels in  Highway Bridge Construction," TRB Special Report 148, Innovations in  Construction and Maintenance of Transportation Facilities, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 1974, pp. 122-135.

19. Kluge, R. W., and Sawyer, H. A., "Interacting Pretensioned Concrete Form Panels for Bridge Decks," PCI JOURNAL, V. 20, No. 3, May-June 1975, pp. 34-61.

20. Barker J. M., "Research, Application and Experience With Precast Prestressed Bridge Deck Panels," PCI JOURNAL, V. 20, No. 6, November-December 1975, pp. 66-85.

21. Barker, J. M., and  McCabe, J. M., Jr., Disc. of "Interacting Pretensioned Concrete  Form Panels for Bridge Decks," by Kluge and Sawyer; and closure, PCI JOURNAL, V. 21, No, 1, January- February 1976, pp. 90-92.

22. Sawyer, H. A., Disc. of"Research, Application and Experience With Precast Prestressed Bridge Deck Panels," by Barker; and closure, PCI JOURNAL, V. 21, No. 4, July-August 1976, pp. 112-113,

23. Barnoff, R. M., et al., "Full Scale Test of a Prestressed Bridge With Precast Deck Planks," PCI JOURNAL, V. 22, No. 5, September-October 1977, pp. 66-83.

24. Kelly, J. B., "Applications of  Stay-in- Place Prestressed Bridge Deck Panels," PCI JOURNAL, V. 24, No. 6, November- December 1979, pp. 20-26.

25. Tokerud R., "Precast Prestressed Concrete Bridges for Low-Volume Roads," PCI JOURNAL, V. 24, No. 4, July-August 1979, pp. 42-56.

26. Tokerud, R., "Economical Structures for Low-Volume Roads," Transportation Research Record 665, Bridge Engineering, V. 2, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 1972, pp. 214-221.

27. Precast Prestressed Concrete Short Span Bridges, Prestressed Concrete Institute, Chicago, Illinois, 1980, 47 pp.

28. Design Supplement to; Precast Prestressed Concrete Short Span Bridges, Prestressed Concrete Institute, Chicago Illinois, 1984, 74 pp.

29. Hays, C. 0., and Lybas, J. M., "Full-Span Form Panels for Highway Bridges," Transportation Research Record 87I, Segmental and Systems Bridge Construction, Concrete Box Girder and Steel Design, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 1982, pp. 23-29.

30. NCHRP Synthesis of Highway Practice 57, Durability of Concrete Bridge Decks, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 1979, 61 pp.

31. URS/Madigan Praeger, Inc., Feasibility Study to Replace a Deteriorated Bridge Deck With Precast Concrete Deck, New York State Thruway Authority, Albany, N.Y., 1973, 67 pp.

32. Gutzwiller, M. J., Lee, R. H., and Seholer, C. F,, "Precast, Prestressed Concrete for Bridge Decks," HRB Special  Report 116, Improving Pavement and Bridge Deck Performance, Highway  Research Board, Washington, D.C., 1971, pp. 30-41.

33. Scholer, C. F., "Eleven-Year Performance of Two Precast, Prestressed Concrete  Bridge Decks," Transportation Research Record 871, Segmental and Systems Bridge Construction; Concrete Box
Girder and Steel Design, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 1982, pp. 34-37.

34. Kavanagh, T. C., "Box Girder Bridge Design," Engineering journal, American Institute of Steel Construction, V. 4, No.  3, July 1967, pp. 100-106.

35. Biswas, M., Iffland, J.S.B., Schofield, R. E., and Gregory, A. E., "Precast  Bridge Deck Replacement Applications,' TRB Special Report I48, Innovations in Construction and Maintenance of Transportation Facilities,Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 1974, pp. 136-148.

36. Donnaruma, R. C., "A Review of the Development of Systems for Precast Deck Replacement for Composite I-Beam Bridges," Report presented to the Research Committee, International Bridge, Tunnel and Turnpike Association, Chicago, Illinois, August 1974, 20 pp.

37. Donnaruma, R. C., ''Performance of Precast Concrete Bridge Deck Panels on the New York Thruway," Report presented at Session 187, 62nd Annual Meeting, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., January, 1983, 6 pp.

38. Knudsen, C. V., "Re-decking of a Bridge With Precast Concrete," Civil Engineering,  American Society of Civil Engineers, New York, V. 50, No. 4, April  1980, pp. 75-77.

39. Slavis, C., "Precast Concrete Deck Modules for Bridge Deck Reconstruction," Transportation Research Record 871,  Segmental and System Bridge Construction; Concrete Box Girder and Steel Design, Transportation Research Board,  Washington, D.C., 1982, pp. 30-33.

40. Slavis, C., "Precast Concrete Deck Modules for Bridge Deck Reconstruction," PCI JOURNAL, V. 28, No. 4., July- August 1983, pp. 120-135.

41. Martin, L. D., et al., Connections for Modular Concrete Bridge Decks, FHWA/RD-821106, NTIS document PB84-118058, Consulting Engineers Group, Inc., Glenview, Illinois, August 1983, 120  pp.

42. Berger, R. H., "Full-Depth Modular Precast, Prestressed Bridge Decks," Transportation  Research Retard 903, RKdges and Culverts, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 1983, pp. 52-59.

43. Lutz, J. G., and Scalia, D. J., "Deck Widening and Replacement of Woodrow  Wilson Memorial Bridge," PCI JOURNAL,V. 29, No. 3, May-June 1984, pp. 74-93.

44. Peterson, P. C., "Milford-Montague Toll Bridge-Deck Replacement With Precast  Concrete-Delaware River Joint Toll Bridge Commission," Presentation-Transcript, International Bridge Tunnel  and Turnpike Association, Spring Workshop, Houston, Texas, April 1983, 12 pp.

45. Kempf, F. J., "Experience in Precast Concrete Bridge Decks,"A Bridge to the Future, Proceedings of the National Bridge Conference, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, June, 1983, pp. 37-48.

46. Smyers, W. L., "Rehabilitation of the Fremont Street Bridge," PCI JOURNAL, V. 29, No. 5, September-October 1984, pp. 34-51.

47. Kulicki, J. M., Waldner, H. E., and Prickett, J. E., "Design of the Cable-Stayed  Mississippi River Bridge at Quincy, Illinois," Transportation Research Record 950, V.2, Transportation Research   Board, Washington, D.C., 1984, pp. 34-50.

48. Hyma, W. R., "On the Santa Fe, Precast Concrete Slabs are Bonded to Steel Bridges," Ruihcart Track and Structures, V. 71, No. 10, October 1975, pp. 29-31.

49. Hyena, W. R., "Replacing Timber Decks on Railway Bridges With Prestressed  Concrete Slabs," Concrete International,V. 1, No. 5, May 1979, pp. 18-21.

50- Haven, P., "On the Santa Fe, Missouri River Bridge Gets Epoxy-Bonded Prestressed Slab Deck," Railway Track and Structures, V. 74, No. 9, September 1978, pp. 40-42.

51. Kao, A. M., and Ballinger, C., "Static and Fatigue Tests on PIC Precast Prestressed  Ribbed Bridge Deck Panels," PCI JOURNAL, V. 27, No. 3, May-June 1982, pp. 76-91.

52. Biswas, M., Osegueda, R. A., and Noel, J. S., "Scale Model Tests for Full-Depth Precast Concrete Panel-Decked Composite Bridge Span," Transportation Research Record 950, V. 1, Transportation  Research Board, Washington, D.C., 1984, pp. 163-173.

53. Biswas, M., Ghattas, O. N., and Vladimirou. H., "Fatigue and Freeze-Thaw Resistance of Epoxy Mortar," Transcript of paper presented at 64th Annual Transporation Research Board Meeting, Washington, D.C., January 14-17, 1985.

54. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, B ridge Rehabilitation and Strengthening, Road Transport Research, Report Prepared by An OECD Scientific Expert Group, Paris,  France, 1983, 103 pp.