Title: Benefits of using 0.7 in. (18 mm) diameter strands in precast, pretensioned girders: A parametric investigation
Date Published: November-December 2017
Volume: 62
Issue: 6
Page Numbers: 59-75
Authors: Jessica Salazar, Hossein Yousefpour, Alex Katz, Roya Alirezaei Abyaneh, Hyun su Kim, David Garber, Trevor Hrynyk, and Oguzhan Bayrak
https://doi.org/10.15554/pcij62.6-04

Click here to view the full journal issue.

Abstract

This paper presents a parametric study on the benefits and limitations of using 0.7 in. (18 mm) diameter strands in precast, pretensioned concrete bridge girders. A validated parametric study tool was used to design a variety of Texas bulb-tee, U, and spread box beams and AASHTO I and bulb-tee girders with 0.5, 0.6, and 0.7 in. (13, 15, and 18 mm) diameter strands using different span lengths, concrete release strengths, and transverse spacings. The results were used to evaluate the effects of using 0.7 in. strands on the quantity of prestressing steel, span capability, attainable superstructure slenderness, and allowable spacing between girders. The most noticeable benefit of 0.7 in. strands over 0.6 in. strands was found to be a reduction of up to 35% in the number of strands. However, the difference in the total weight of prestressing steel was insignificant. Increasing the release strength of concrete, at least to 7.5 ksi (52 MPa), was found to be essential to observe benefits in design aspects other than the number of strands.

References

Vadivelu, J. 2009. “Impact of Larger Diameter Strands on AASHTO/PCI Bulb-Tees.” MS thesis, University of Tennesee, Knoxville.

Morcous, G., K. Hanna, and M. K. Tadros. 2011. “Impact of 0.7 inch Diameter Strands on NU I-Girders.” Lincoln, NE: Nebraska Department of Roads.

Morcous, G., K. Hanna, and M. K. Tadros. 2011. “Use of 0.7-in.-Diameter Strands in Pretensioned Bridge Girders.” PCI Journal 56 (4): 65–82.

Morcous, G., A. Hatami, M. Maguire, K. Hanna, and M. Tadros. 2012. “Mechanical and Bond Properties of 18-mm- (0.7-in.-) Diameter Prestressing Strands.” Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering 24 (6): 735–744.

Maguire, M., G. Morcous, and M. Tadros. 2013. “Structural Performance of Precast/Prestressed Bridge Double-Tee Girders Made of High-Strength Concrete, Welded Wire Reinforcement, and 18-mm- Diameter Strands.” Journal of Bridge Engineering 18 (10): 1053–1061.

Morcous, G., S. Assad, A. Hatami, and M. K. Tadros. 2014. “Implementation of 0.7 in. Diameter Strands at 2.0 × 2.0 in. Spacing in Pretensioned Bridge Girders.” PCI Journal 59 (3): 145–158.

Dang, C. N., R. W. Floyd, W. M. Hale, and J. R. Martí-Vargas. 2016. “Spacing Requirements of 0.7 in. (18 mm) Diameter Prestressing Strands.” PCI Journal 61 (1): 70–87.

Dang, C. N., R. W. Floyd, W. M. Hale, and J. R. Martí-Vargas. 2016. “Measured Development Lengths of 0.7 in. (17.8 mm) Strands for Pretensioned Beams.” ACI Structural Journal 113 (3): 525–535.

Dang, C. N., R. W. Floyd, W. M. Hale, and J. R. Martí-Vargas. 2016. “Measured Transfer Lengths of 0.7 in. (17.8 mm) Strands for Pretensioned Beams.” ACI Structural Journal 113 (10): 85–94.

Geren, K. L., and M. K. Tadros. 1994. “The NU Precast/Prestressed Concrete Bridge I-Girder Series.” PCI Journal 39 (3): 26–39.

PCI Bridge Design Manual Steering Committee. 2011. PCI Bridge Design Manual. MNL-133. 3rd ed. Chicago, IL: PCI.

Hanna, K., G. Morcous, and M. K. Tadros. 2010. “Design Aids of NU I-Girder Bridges.” Lincoln, NE: Nebraska Department of Roads.

AASHTO (American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials). 2008. AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications, 4th Edition—2008 Interim Revisions. Washington, DC: AASHTO.

TxDOT (Texas Department of Transportation). 2015. Prestressed Concrete I-Girder Details. Austin, TX: TxDOT.

TxDOT. 2011. “Prestressed Concrete X-Beam Details (Type XB20).” Austin, TX: TxDOT.

TxDOT. 2011. “Prestressed Concrete X-Beam Details (Type XB28). Austin, TX: TxDOT.

TxDOT. 2011. “Prestressed Concrete X-Beam Details (Type XB34).” Austin, TX: TxDOT.

TxDOT. 2011. “Prestressed Concrete X-Beam Details (Type XB40).” Austin, TX: TxDOT.

TxDOT. 2014. “Prestressed Concrete U-Beam Details.” Austin, TX: TxDOT.

Garber, D. B., J. M. Gallardo, D. J. Deschenes, and O. Bayrak. 2012. “Effect of New Prestress Loss Estimates on Pretensioned Concrete Bridge Girder Design.” Austin, TX: Texas Department of Transportation.

Garber, D. B., J. M. Gallardo, D. J. Deschenes, and O. Bayrak. 2016. “Prestress Loss Calculations: Another Perspective.” PCI Journal 61 (3): 68–85.

AASHTO. 2016. AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications, 7th Edition—2016 Interim Revisions. Washington, DC: AASHTO.

Salazar, J. L. 2016. “End-Region Behavior of Precast, Pretensioned I-Girders Employing 0.7 inch Diameter Prestressing Strands.” MS thesis, University of Texas at Austin.

Salazar, J., H. Yousefpour, R. Alirezaei Abyaneh, H. Kim, A. Katz, T. Hrynyk, and O. Bayrak. 2017. “End-Region Behavior of Pretensioned I-Girders Employing 0.7 in. (17.8 mm) Strands.” ACI Structural Journal (forthcoming).

Katz, A., H. Yousefpour, H. Kim, R. Alirezaei Abyaneh, J. Salazar, T. Hrynyk, and O. Bayrak. 2017. “Shear Performance of Pretensioned Concrete I-Girders Employing 0.7 in. (17.8 mm) Strands.” ACI Structural Journal 114 (5): 1273–1284.

Kim, H., A. Katz, A., J. Salazar, R. Abyaneh, H. Yousefpour, T. Hrynyk, and O. Bayrak. 2017. “End-Region Serviceability and Shear Strength of Precast, Pretensioned I-Girders Employing 0.7-in. Diameter Strands.” PCI/NBC 2017, Cleveland, OH.