Title: Flexural Strength of Reinforced and Prestressed Concrete T-Beams
Date: January-February, 2005
Volume: 50
Issue: 1
Page number: 44-73
Author(s): Stephen J. Seguirant, Richard Brice, Bijan Khaleghi
https://doi.org/10.15554/pcij.01012005.44.73
Click here to access the full journal article
Abstract
The calculation of the flexural strength of concrete T-beams has been extensively discussed in recent issues of the PCI JOURNAL. The debate centers on when T-beam behavior is assumed to begin. The AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications (LRFD) maintain that it begins when c (distance from extreme compression fiber to neutral axis) exceeds the thickness of the flange. The AASHTO Standard Specifications for Highway Bridges (STD), and other references, contend that it begins when a (depth of equivalent rectangular stress block) exceeds the flange thickness. This paper examines the fundamentals of T-beam behavior at nominal flexural strength, and compares the results of LRFD and STD with more rigorous analyses, including the PCI Bridge Design Manual (PCI BDM) method and a strain compatibility approach using nonlinear concrete compressive stress distributions. For pretensioned T-beams of uniform strength, a method consisting of a mixture of LRFD and STD is investigated. For T-beams with different concrete strengths in the flange and web, the PCI BDM method is compared with the nonlinear strain compatibility analysis. High strength concretes (HSC) up to 5,000 psi (103 MPa) are considered. The selection of appropriate p factors and maximum reinforcement limits is also discussed. Comparisons with previous tests of T-beams are presented, and revisions to the relevant sections of LRFD are proposed.
References
1. Seguirant, S. J., “Effective Compression Depth of T-Sections at Nominal Flexural Strength,” Open Forum: Problems and Solutions, PCI JOURNAL, V.47, No. 1, January-February 2002, pp. 100-105. See also discussion by A. E. Naaman and closure to discussion in V. 47, No. 3, May-June 2002, pp. 107-113.
2. Girgis, A., Sun, C., and Tadros, M. K., “Flexural Strength of Continuous Bridge Girders - Avoiding the Penalty in the AASHTO LRFD Specifications,” Open Forum: Problems and Solutions, PCI JOURNAL, V. 47, No. 4, July-August 2002, pp. 138-141.
3. Naaman, A. E., “Rectangular Stress Block and T-Section Behavior,” Open Forum: Problems and Solutions, PCI JOURNAL, V. 47, No. 5, September-October 2002, pp. 106-112.
4. AASHTO, LRFD Bridge Design Specifications, Third Edition, American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, DC, 2004.
5. Mattock, A. H., Kriz, L. B., and Hognestad, E., “Rectangular Concrete Stress Distribution in Ultimate Strength Design,” ACI Journal, V. 32, No. 8, January 1961, pp. 875-928.
6. ACI Committee 318, “Commentary of Building Code Requirements for Reinforced Concrete (ACI 31 8R-83),” American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, MI, 1983.
7. Nawy, E. G., Prestressed Concrete - A Fundamental Approach, Second Edition, Prentice-Hall, Inc., Simon & Schuster/A Viacom Company, Upper Saddle River, NJ, 1996, pp. 187-189.
8. AASHTO, Standard Specifications for Highway Bridges, Seventeenth Edition, American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, DC, 2002.
9. PCI Bridge Design Manual, Precast/Prestressed Concrete Institute, Chicago, IL, 1997.
10. ACI Committee 318, “Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete (ACI 318-02) and Commentary (ACI 318R-02),” American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, MI, 2002.
11. Collins, M. P., and Mitchell, D., Prestressed Concrete Structures, Prentice-Hall, Inc., A Division of Simon & Schuster, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1991, pp. 61-65.
12. Naaman, A. E.,”Unified Design Recommendations for Reinforced, Prestressed, and Partially Prestressed Concrete Bending and Compression Members,” ACI Structural Journal, V. 89, No. 2, March-April 1992, pp. 200-210.
13. Weigel, J. A., Seguirant, S. J., Brice, R., and Khaleghi, B., “High Performance Precast, Prestressed Concrete Girder Bridges in Washington State,” PCI JOURNAL, V. 48, No. 2, March-April 2003, pp. 28-52.
14. ACI Committee 318, “Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete (ACI 318-99) and Commentary (ACT 318R-99),” American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, MI, 1999.
15. Mast, R. F., “Unified Design Provisions for Reinforced and Prestressed Concrete Flexural and Compression Members,” ACI Structural Journal, V. 89, No. 2, March-April 1992, pp. 185-199. See also discussions by R. K. Devalapura and M. K. Tadros, C. W. Dolan and J. V. Loscheider and closure to discussions in V. 89, No. 5, September-October 1992, pp. 591-593.
16. ACT Committee 318, “Building Code Requirements for Reinforced Concrete (ACI 318-89) and Commentary (ACI 318R-89),” American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, MI, 1989.
17. ACI Committee 318, “Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete (ACI 318-95) and Commentary (ACI 318R-95),” American Concrete Institute, Farinington Hills, MI, 1995.
18. Bae, S., and Bayrak, O., “Stress Block Parameters for High Strength Concrete Members,” ACI Structural Journal, V. 100, No. 5, September-October 2003, pp. 626-636.
19. Ibrahim, H. H. H., and MacGregor, J. G., “Tests of Eccentrically Loaded High-Strength Concrete Columns,” ACI Structural Journal, V. 93, No. 5, September-October 1996, pp. 585-594.
20. Ozden, S., “Behavior of High-Strength Concrete Under Strain Gradient,” MA Thesis, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada, 1992, pp. 112-113.
21. Bayrak, 0., “Seismic Performance of Rectilinearly Confined High-Strength Concrete Columns,” PhD Dissertation, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada, 1999, pp. 80-187.
22. Ma, Z., Huo, X., Tadros, M. K., and Baishya, M., “Restraint Moments in Precast/Prestressed Concrete Continuous Bridges,” PCI JOURNAL, V. 43, No. 6, November-December 1998, pp. 40-57.
23. Castrodale, R. W., Burns, N. H., and Kreger, M. F., “A Study of Pretensioned High Strength Concrete Girders in Composite Highway Bridges - Laboratory Tests,” Research Report 381-3, Center for Transportation Research, University of Texas at Austin, TX, January 1988.
24. Devalapura, R. K., and Tadros, M. K., “Critical Assessment of ACI 318 Eq. (18-3) for Prestressing Steel Stress at Ultimate Flexure,” ACI Structural Journal, V. 89, No. 5, September-October 1992, pp. 538-546.
25. Naaman, A. E., “Limits of Reinforcement in 2002 ACI Code: Transition, Flaws, and Solution,” ACI Structural Journal, V. 101, No. 2, March-April 2004, pp. 209-2 18.